Welcome to INCF Neuroinformatics 2009
→
Workshops
→
How should a neuron be modeled? Biophysical detail vs. abstraction
How should a neuron be modeled? Biophysical detail vs. abstraction
- Advances in the automatic analysis of multi-dimensional data
- Ontologies for neuroscience: applications and advances
- How should a neuron be modeled? Biophysical detail vs. abstraction
- High performance computing and grid infrastructure for neuroinformatics applications
- The neuroinformatics of neural connectivity
Workshop 3
Title: How should a neuron be modeled? Biophysical detail vs. abstraction
Chair: Gaute Einevoll, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas, Norway
Co-chair: Andreas Herz, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
This question has commonly evoked heated, although not always constructive, discussions. In this workshop, however, the aim is to outline and discuss the pros and cons of the various approaches in an enlightening way.The neuron appears to be the fundamental computational entity in the brain, and in computational neuroscience the choice of mathematical model for the neurons is crucial: Should one include as much biophysical detail as possible, or should one opt for simpler neuron models incorporating only certain salient features in their barest forms? Or something in between?
Speakers:
-
Arnd Roth, University College London, UK
-
Wulfram Gerstner, Ecole Polytechnique Fédèrale de Lausanne, Switzerland
-
Peter Hunter, University of Auckland, New Zealand